Balancing Elections & Love

Jesus told us to go and make disciples, but too many of us may have focused instead on making policy.

Many Christians have placed an inordinate amount of effort, resources, and emphasis on the necessity of winning elections for the cause of the gospel: Win the election, win the culture. And as I’ve heard in mournful, hushed tones during periods of political setback: Lose the election, lose the culture.  Unfortunately, trying to change culture through elections is like changing your hair by drawing on the mirror.  The changes, as substantial as they may appear, last only as long as the (voting) body stays in place.

Our  theory of elections only amplifies our need for a more discerning Christian theory of involvement.

Take gay rights, for example. We wring our hands over the success of the gay rights movement and attribute it largely to President Obama’s supportive policies. Yet, “most of the gains in visibility, legitimacy, and legal rights by the gay rights movement were made during the twelve consecutive years of the Reagan and Bush presidencies.” *

Our hope for change must be rooted in more than votes, and our witness must be more winsome that our politics. Our involvement must be as holistic as our discipleship. This is because institutions have greater power than individuals, infrastructures more influence than ideas, and interlinking networks shape national morals more than pietism.* For example, if we want to shift the gay rights movement, we have to be involved in Obama’s 2nd inaugural address… and the repealing of ‘Don’t ask, Don’t tell…’ and the entertainment industry… and the arts… and powerful lobbying groups… and people with gobs and gobs of money… and our own church’s failure to retain our youth… and many more.

Our emphasis on the government’s ability to legislate morality distracts us from true discipleship, which in turn could neuter our ability to bring true change. Instead of making non-Christians do what we want, we’re called to make disciples.

We need disciples because elections and the government don’t project cultural values; they reflect them. Take the abolition of slavery. It is evident from Lincoln’s writings and speeches that he detested slavery and opposed its expansion throughout his political career. It is equally evident that he had no intention of involving the federal government in the abolition movement until he believed the majority of the population shared a similar view. That’s why he assured the Southern States that he had no intention of interfering with slavery in his 1st Inaugural Address, and yet pushed for the 13th Amendment to abolish the institution of slavery shortly before his 2nd Inaugural Address.

Lincoln was a pragmatist rather than an ideologue, with the primary goal of preserving the Union. He abhorred slavery, but he waited until the events of the Civil War and the abolitionist movement shifted the heart of the populace to a point where his gut told him they would accept first the Emancipation Declaration and then the 13th Amendment.

Imagine if the abolitionists seized a political election to define their cause.

The government can force people to be moral (don’t kill), but it can’t make people disciples. This is not to say that disciples shouldn’t be involved in politics–of course we should! But our politics should flow naturally from our presence.*

Which is another way of saying, Christians should make their life their ministry instead of making politics their life.

*James Davison Hunter’s To Change the World

** This is Part 4. See Part 1 herePart 2 here, and Part 3 here.

Advertisements

About Tim Owens

I'm a husband, father, and Christ follower. I also live in Albany, NY, where I work as a pastor.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Balancing Elections & Love

  1. Pingback: Untangling the wires–A Christian Theology of Involvement for US Americans | inexhaustible significance

  2. Pingback: Balancing Elections & Love | inexhaustible significance | ChristianBookBarn.com

  3. Alan P Demers says:

    Based on your previous posts, When I read your first few semtences of this one… I thought you were going to discuss the argument among Christian people groups of works versus election ( another essay against the Roman Catholic church ( my heritage)!! Anyway, I’m glad you didn’t go that way… I did enjoy your essay!! And I couldn’t agree more… because I’ve been divided in my pokitical views and sociological values… boy how quickly my selfish nature comes to rear its ugly face!! Now that I owe so much pf my life to social security and Medicaid… I had to vote for Obama (from the party that introduced the government financed social subsidies)!!! FDR would be proud!!!
    Ugh!!! I just got my repaired computer back, and this new Windows 8 is something to get used to!! I wish I had my new Apple computer: I’d rather waste my time trying to learn a new computer system instead of getting used to a crippled system!!!!:
    just adds to the story of my life… “Bad Timing!!” figure that system out!

  4. Sue Lichtig says:

    Another thoughtful post. Pastor Jim Wallis said instead of following a politician who puts his/her finger up to see which way the wind is blowing, Christains should be the wind changers.

  5. Pingback: Wednesday’s Tumbleweed – 02/06/13 | Jessica McCracken

  6. Pingback: Prostitutes for Power | inexhaustible significance

Join the discussion by adding your thoughts and questions!!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s