Army-issued Bible gun

As a pastor of a local church, I think about the Bible a lot. I think about what it says about God, what it says to me, and how I might encourage other people to read it, to take it seriously. In many ways, I’ve devoted my life to helping people participate in the Grand Story of the Bible.

Which is precisely why I was encouraged to read the report that the U.S. Army is directing soldiers to remove a Bible inscription that a vendor etched onto the scopes.*

Not all of my friends agree. Some of them even suggest a vague parallel between the Army’s directive and Nazi Germany. I understand that there are multiple perspectives on the matter, especially since the Bible holds a central position in the Christian faith. With that said, it benefits us all to contemplate its usage in society as a whole. These are the reasons I’d rather not see the Bible on U.S Army gun scopes:

As an American citizen, I’d feel uncomfortable if our soldiers were given government-issued weapons with references from the Quran, or any other religion’s holy book. As groups like The Becket Fund and the ACLJ attest, it is “vital to protect the free expression of all faiths,” and we believe the U.S. Constitution “ensures religious liberty and safeguards human rights and dignity.” I’m thankful that the First Amendment ensures that my children don’t have to embrace the Quran, just as it assures my Muslim neighbors that their children don’t have to embrace the Bible.

As a Christian, inscribing John 8:12 (“I am the light of the world”) and 2 Corinthians 4:6 (“God made his light shine in our hearts”) on the very instrument a soldier uses to stare down another human as he takes their life seems inappropriate. The article I linked to above concludes with a Christian soldier serving in the Army stating that “our mission is to kill the enemy.” It seems offensive to link the mission of Jesus to the mission of killing the enemies of the U.S.

As a missionary, I shudder to think of the implications behind one country’s soldiers claiming the Bible as their own as they mingle it with the act of killing their enemy. It’s hard for people to hear Jesus say, “For God so loved the world” when they know his words are claimed by the weapon that killed their loved one.

As a historian, I understand that the Bible is not a talisman, or a good-luck charm. God doesn’t bless soldiers just because their weapons carry references to His Bible, just as He didn’t bless soldiers just because they carried His ark into battle. God blesses soldiers who honor Him and obey Him. I know a great deal of Christians in the Army, and they all tell me the same thing: the Army is hard place for a Christian. It seems unwise to require thousands of non-Christians to use weapons etched with Bible references to kill their enemies.

As a pastor, I believe that Jesus wants his words etched into our hearts, not our guns. Furthermore, I fear that it’s easy to succumb to the placebo effect when it comes to Bible verses: if we see them referenced in plaques, monuments, and gun scopes it’s easy to tell ourselves that we are a Christian nation. I believe we’re better served by focusing on the Bible’s impact on living hearts instead cold, dead gun metal.

May we honor God’s word with the ways we use it.

*This is a current news story, but the Army dealt with the same issue in 2010.


About Tim Owens

I'm a husband, father, and Christ follower. I also live in Albany, NY, where I work as a pastor.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Army-issued Bible gun

  1. macrackalackin says:

    So I don’t post much on your blog. I stalk. And this is slightly melodramatic as it’s late and I’m tired BUT when I read your blog the word “Amen” and its lost meaning (so be it) clamor to get out of my mouth.

  2. Daniel Vance says:

    Couldn’t agree more, Tim. And I probably would speak less charitably than you have with those who have a different opinion. I think it is sacrilege that the verses where even put on the weapons in the first place.

    Also, as an aside, I realize I am probably too critical on your message boards. I wanted to let you know that the story you recently re-posted about taking your child to Good Friday is my favorite post of yours. I read it last year, and it was the reason that I became a lurker of this blog. I had almost the exact same thoughts as you last Easter, as I contemplated bringing my very sensitive son to the visceral Good Friday service, and concluded with the fact that my son was very much in need of that sacrifice, and was the cause of it.

    • Tim Owens says:

      Daniel–you are nowhere near too critical. I honestly appreciate all of your comments, in many ways because I know we don’t have the same perspective on everything, not in spite of it.

      One of my foundational convictions behind my blogging is that we (church in particular, Americans and humanity in general) are better off talking about things that matter dearly, even if we don’t always agree. Even though I know you and I agree on the big things, we disagree on some of the smaller things. I’ve felt that all of our discussions (here, on fb, etc) have proven the point of my blog: we’re better off when we’re talking than when we’re in our silos. I’ve also enjoyed our respectful, fun, witty exchanges. 🙂

Join the discussion by adding your thoughts and questions!!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s